USPTO serial 77724240
JURINNOV THE LEGAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3839838Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JURINNOV THE LEGAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS & DESIGN, INC.
GREENSBORO, NC
Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS & DESIGN, INC.
Cleveland, OH
Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing facilities for legal technology training for the legal industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing technical consulting services, namely, providing electronic discovery services for the legal industry, and computer forensic services for the legal industry; providing technology provisioning services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for electronic discovery, data management, data collection, data recovery, data processing, data harvesting, information culling, information searching, file creation, computer usage reconstruction, deleted data analysis, digital evidence analysis, online document review, case management, analytics and workflow consulting, for the legal industry; and providing computer forensic services for the legal industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Providing technical consulting services, namely, providing litigation document review services and litigation support services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS & DESIGN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JurInnov Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Jurinnov Holding Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named JURINNOV THE LEGAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |