Drawing for WHOLE SOUL

USPTO serial 77724746

WHOLE SOUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLE SOUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025hats, caps, head wear, jackets, sweat shirts, t-shirts, pants and shorts, sold on-premises at Applicant's seminars and events and through Applicant's web siteACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 7, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 22, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 3, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Jul 11, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 16, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 17, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 3, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 3, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 3, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 3, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance