USPTO serial 77728759
RDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
TAL GRINBLAT LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO, MARSHALL & HARLAN16633 VENTURA BLVD STE 1100ENCINO, CA 91436-1865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in authoring, encoding, storing and organizing audio data; computer software for use in authoring, encoding, storing and organizing audio files; computer software for accessing, browsing and searching online databases; computer software for use in social networking database management; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of entertainment featuring pre-recorded audiovisual works and merchandise related to pre-recorded audio and audiovisual works, provided via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks; retail services in the nature of subscriptions to multimedia content provided online and via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of streamed and downloadable video files via computer and other communications networks; broadcasting and transmission of streamed and downloadable digital video content via computer and other communications networks; providing on-line bulletin boards and community forums for transmission of messages among users in the field of entertainment, concerts and news | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Subscription based website featuring concert and entertainment information; entertainment services, namely, providing a website and database featuring entertainment related current events and entertainment news | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line facilities, via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks, to enable users to retrieve concert information; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Internet services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on global computer networks for others; searching, browsing and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on global computer networks for others; providing a website enabling customers to program text, video, and other multimedia content, including concerts, news, and entertainment-related programs on a website and mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pulser Music Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pulser Music Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RDIO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RDIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |