Drawing for RITTER

USPTO serial 77730355

RITTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RITTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Flynn

SARAH OTTE GRABER WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STREETCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Oil-less air compressors; lubricated air compressors, dental ultrasonic cleaners, namely, electrical ultrasonic cleaning units for cleaning dental equipmentACTIVE
010Dental chairs, dental stools, instrument delivery systems comprised of air and water delivery tubes and controls, operating lights for medical use only, oral surgery chairs, surgery lights for medical use only, examination floor lights for medical use only, dental operatory casework, namely, cabinets, dental furniture, dental instrument processing centers, namely instrument cleaners and associated cabinets, and dental sterilizersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 14, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 14, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 28, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 19, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Apr 12, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Mar 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Feb 3, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 29, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 29, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 29, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 10, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 10, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 10, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 10, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
May 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance