Drawing for SILICONEDGE

USPTO serial 77739317

SILICONEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILICONEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brittany Estell

Brittany Estell Western Digital Technologies, Inc.5601 Great Oaks ParkwaySan Jose, CA 95119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for semiconductor memory devices, namely, software for use in managing electronic storage of dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 2, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Nov 2, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2012UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Feb 16, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 28, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 9, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 9, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 10, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 10, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance