USPTO serial 77742319
XPLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4113420Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2012
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XPLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
Yoon S. Ham LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gauges for measuring angle levels, Clinometers, Electric measuring devices, namely, electronic sensors for measuring weight distribution and weight of human body, Precision measuring apparatus, namely, distance measuring apparatus, Electric inclination-controlled foot plate in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Electric posture-controlling foot plate sold together in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Automatic control foot plate in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Motor-driven inclination-controlled foot plate in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Motor-driven posture-controlling foot plate in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Inclination-controlled foot plate for screen golf in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Posture-controlling foot plate for screen golf in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Automatic inclination-controlled foot plate in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Automatic inclination-controlled foot plate for screen golf in the nature of a game controller for computer games, Electric and electronic sensors for detecting and measuring length of angles, Electric and electronic clinometers, Electronic displays, namely, plasma display panels, electrophoretic displays, Liquid crystal displays, LED displays, Electronic operating panels for controlling machines, Remote controls for computer games, Encoders and incremental encoders; Remote controls for use with electronic sports training simulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Electric inclination-controlled foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Electric posture-controlling foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Automatic control foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Motor-driven inclination-controlled foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Motor-driven posture-controlling foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Inclination-controlled foot plate for screen golf sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators for golf, Posture-controlling foot plate for screen golf sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators for golf, Automatic inclination-controlled foot plate sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators, Automatic inclination-controlled foot plate for screen golf sold together as an integral part of electronic sports training simulators for golf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |