USPTO serial 77750567
G CAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G CAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fuel Transfer Technologies Inc.
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Fuel Transfer Technologies Inc.
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher N. Hunter
Christopher N. Hunter Norton Rose Canada LLP200 Bay Street, Suite 3800Royal Bank Plaza, South TowerToronto, ON, M5J2Z4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fuel transfer systems comprised of automatic fueling nozzles and fuel pumps not for land vehicles for use with portable fuel containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Fuel transfer systems comprised of non-metal fuel hoses and non-metal vapor hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Portable fuel containers made from plastic, namely, containers for industrial and commercial liquids not made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fuel Transfer Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fuel Transfer Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named G CAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |