USPTO serial 77755468
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby tops; Baseball caps; Boxer shorts; Caps; Dress shirts; Moisture-wicking sports shirts; Night shirts; Polo shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Sweat shirts; Swim wear; Ties; Turtle neck shirts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |