Drawing for ÉPICÉ

USPTO serial 77756470

ÉPICÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ÉPICÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark R. Malek

Mark R. Malek Zies Widerman & Malek1990 W. New Haven AvenueSuite 201Melbourne, FL 32904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamin supplementsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 23, 2010NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 22, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 15, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 15, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 27, 2010ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED
Apr 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 29, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 16, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jun 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance