Drawing for SLEEP BETTER, LIVE BETTER

USPTO serial 77764096

SLEEP BETTER, LIVE BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLEEP BETTER, LIVE BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary M. Lee

MARY M LEE MARY M LEE PC1300 E 9TH STREET SUITE 4EDMOND, OK 73034-5760UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Sleep products, namely, mattresses, spring mattresses, box springs and mattress foundationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 10, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 10, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 21, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 18, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2012CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Apr 23, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 21, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 21, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 26, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 26, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2011CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 6, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 12, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 12, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 12, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance