USPTO serial 77776525
CRISPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRISPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Adkins
CHRISTOPHER S ADKINS K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils, edible fats and all emulsions thereof, namely, palm oil, palm olein, red palm super olein, red palm olein, palm fat, dough fat, vegetable ghee, ghee, shortening, cooking oil, frying oil, milk fat replacer, animal fat replacer, other oil products and oil derivatives, namely, corn oil, coconut oil, palm kernel oil for food, olive oil for food, sesame oil, canola oil, sunflower oil, groundnut oil and soya bean oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |