CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BITE ME

USPTO serial 77777885

BITE ME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BITE ME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Posa

JOHN G POSA GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON ET ALPO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007-7021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Pet food stuff, namely edible greetings in the form of panels, biscuits and chipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 14, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 14, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 17, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 31, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 23, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2011GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2011CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2010RMDTEXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB—
Nov 23, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 13, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance