USPTO serial 77785914
SUNTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fremantle, WA, AU
Fremantle, WA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith
AMY B. GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Solar photovoltaic modules to convert sunlight into electricity; electrical inverters to convert direct current (DC) electricity into alternating current (AC) electricity | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | 44EM | 44(e) PETITION - DISMISSED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |