USPTO serial 77787264
ONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stittsville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Chiabotti
PETER A. CHIABOTTI AKERMAN SENTERFITT222 LAKEVIEW AVENUESUITE 400WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-6147Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's, and children's clothing, namely, insulated outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, shell jackets, sweaters, shirts, pants; footwear, namely, shoes; hats and caps; gloves, mittens, arm gaiters, hand and arm warmers, leg warmers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |