Drawing for RESOLUTION

USPTO serial 77807772

RESOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John T. Raffle

51 GIBRALTAR DR STE 3CMORRIS PLAINS, NJ 07950-1254Morris Plains, NJ 07950

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, nerve and muscle tissue stimulators; medical devices for treating gastric motility and gastric ailments, the foregoing treatment accomplished by electrically stimulating and modulating nerve and muscle tissueACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 10, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance