Drawing for STINGER Q4

USPTO serial 77810135

STINGER Q4

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STINGER Q4?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti

ERIC M. SCHMALZ FOLEY & LARDNER LLP777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Vehicles, namely, fire fighting trucksACTIVEAug 11, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 18, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 22, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 22, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 20, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 20, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance