USPTO serial 77815552
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. Bretschneider
William L. Bretschneider Silicon Valley Law Group50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 750SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, books, brochures, newsletters and reports relating to the field of technology services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of technology services companies and professionals and the technology services industry; arranging and conducting business conferences, trade shows, and trade show exhibitions in the field of technology services; association services, namely, promoting the interests of members within the technology services industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting seminars, educational conferences, webinars and roundtable discussions in the field of technology services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Certification services, namely, developing, evaluating, and testing standards relating to the providing of technology services, for the purpose of certification | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |