USPTO serial 77819988
ORMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port MacDonnell, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Artificial plant-cultivation soil made of mineral materials; Botanical extracts for use in making cosmetics; Charcoal for use as a soil conditioner; Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and for a wide variety of goods; Fermented rice bran for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; Fertiliser for soil and potting soil; Horticultural products, namely, soil amendments that are incorporated into or onto a turf, lawn or soil profile for creating a health medium for increased root growth and/or a smoother turf or lawn surface cut or appearance; Mineral fertilising preparations; Soil additives; Soil amendments; Soil conditioning preparations; Soil improving agents; Soil improving preparations; Soil surfactant used to promote uniform movement of water in soil | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamin and mineral preparations for use as a nutritional supplement or medicinal ingredient in both the foods and pharmaceutical industries | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 029 | Processed, canned, dried, frozen, prepared, packaged, and preserved fruits and vegetables; processed edible seeds; dried or processed edible seaweed; dried edible algae | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | Processed herbs; spices | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 031 | Fresh, raw, and unprocessed fruits, vegetables, and herbs; agricultural seeds | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 033 | Wines and liqueurs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring fruits, vegetables, seeds, herbs, and spices | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOLSBEE, HENRY ALFRED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ORMUS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |