Drawing for GAIT CYCLE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 77825258

GAIT CYCLE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAIT CYCLE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael O. Sturm

MICHAEL O. STURM STURM & FIX LLP206 6TH AVESUITE 1213DES MOINES, IA 50309-4015

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic Inserts For FootwearACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 14, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 14, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 27, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 12, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 12, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Jun 22, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 19, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 11, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Sep 29, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Sep 16, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance