USPTO serial 77834831
EV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
Bradley P. Hartman Hartman Law PLC7114 E. Stetson DriveSuite 205Scottsdale, AZ 85251-3250Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), namely, charging stations for electric vehicles and chargers for batteries; battery charging systems comprised of chargers and charger cables designed for on-road electric vehicles; DC fast chargers; electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software; electrical power distribution units | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Battery charging services; battery charging services in the nature of providing access to electric vehicle chargers and charging infrastructure; installation and maintenance of electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment and computer hardware therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer software for electrical vehicle supply systems, equipment and battery chargers; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with electrical vehicle supply systems, equipment, and hardware for electrical vehicle supply systems, equipment and battery chargers; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting computer software problems for electrical vehicle supply systems, equipment and battery chargers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOTALITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOTALITY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |