USPTO serial 77841572
ONE TAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4192078Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2012
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONE TAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Cadwell
JEFFREY R. CADWELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for authenticating personal and card identification information relating to electronic payment and financial transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for authenticating personal and card identification information relating to electronic payment and financial transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Online identification authentication services, namely, providing authentication of personal and card identification information relating to electronic payment and financial transactions; providing online user authentication of electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SecureKey Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SecureKey Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ONE TAP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |