Drawing for GRAND CENTRAL

USPTO serial 77842960

GRAND CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAND CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIANNE NABONG

KRISTIANNE NABONG SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION3401 N. CALIFORNIACHICAGO, IL 60618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for incorporating a bonus feature on a stand alone gaming machine with or without video input, that upon the occurrence of a trigger event, provides a chance for an enhanced payout or additional plays; Computer hardware and software for incorporating a bonus system for server linked gaming machines, that upon the occurrence of a trigger event, provides a chance for an enhanced payout or additional plays; Electronic gaming machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 26, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 23, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 7, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 1, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 1, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 30, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 28, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance