USPTO serial 77846474
AWAREBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with AWAREBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Meta-Fleet International Corporation
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Other trademarks owned by Meta-Fleet International Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara Reedy Sliva
Tara Reedy Sliva DENTONS US LLPP.O. Box 1302CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy services for product lifecycle and process management improvement | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the use of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an interactive website that enables users to access, track, manage, and monitor information in the field of product lifecycle and process management for the design and manufacture of products, in the field of asset management for the operation and maintenance of assets, in the field of document management and process management and in the field of project management; maintenance and data conversion and transition of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; software development services; technical consulting services in the fields of design, selection, development, implementation and use of computer hardware, and in the fields of connectivity, software systems and solutions for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AWAREBASE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AWAREBASE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AWAREBASE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Meta-Fleet International Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AWAREBASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |