USPTO serial 77850459
CHEF MARY B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEF MARY B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Bloomfield, MI
West Bloomfield, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and demonstrations in the field of culinary arts and raw food lifestyle and distribution of training material in connection therewith | ABANDONED | Mar 8, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |