CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HEMERUS

USPTO serial 77854935

HEMERUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEMERUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Edward Dolgorukov

D. EDWARD DOLGORUKOV MARSHALL AND MELHORN4 SEAGATE FL 8TOLEDO, OH 43604-2608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005blood thinners; blood preservatives and anticoagulantsACTIVE—
009Equipment for processing and storage in a blood bank; laboratory centrifugesACTIVE—
010blood banking equipment and supplies for blood collection, namely, apheresis devices in the nature of tubing, valves, containers and bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 23, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance