Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77868569?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77868569. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PENTHOUSE LOUNGE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77868569, the listed owner(s) include: General Media Communications, Inc., General Media Communications, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77868569?

Serial number 77868569 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PENTHOUSE LOUNGE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PENTHOUSE LOUNGE?

PENTHOUSE LOUNGE (77868569) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PENTHOUSE LOUNGE?

The public record lists International Classes: 041, 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77868569

PENTHOUSE LOUNGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Nov 9, 2009
Status date: Jan 20, 2014
Registration date: —
Examiner: SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENTHOUSE LOUNGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

David L. Sigalow Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.255 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1401Orlando, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Nightclub Services	ACTIVE	—
043	Bar and restaurant services	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 9, 2016	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Mar 2, 2016	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jan 29, 2014	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jan 21, 2014	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2014	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2013	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jul 11, 2013	EX5G	SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	—
Jul 11, 2013	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Jun 13, 2013	EXT5	SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED	—
Jun 13, 2013	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2013	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jan 11, 2013	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Dec 7, 2012	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Dec 7, 2012	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2012	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jun 18, 2012	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jun 12, 2012	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Jun 12, 2012	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jan 3, 2012	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Dec 8, 2011	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Dec 8, 2011	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2011	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Aug 19, 2011	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Aug 18, 2011	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Aug 18, 2011	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Aug 1, 2011	TPEX	SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	—
Aug 1, 2011	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Aug 1, 2011	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jul 18, 2011	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2011	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2011	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Mar 2, 2011	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 14, 2010	NOAM	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 19, 2010	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Oct 19, 2010	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2010	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Sep 13, 2010	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Sep 10, 2010	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 10, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 9, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 23, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 13, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 16, 2009	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Nov 12, 2009	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—