Drawing for WEBMEETING

USPTO serial 77870097

WEBMEETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBMEETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Adams

MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone apparatus; computer hardware for telecommunications; computer software for telecommunications, namely, computer programs for operating telecommunications devices and computer database integration software for telecommunications systems, computer operating systems, business management systems, information networks, and communications networks; magnetically encoded prepaid telephone calling cardsACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, personal and business communication servicesACTIVE—
042Computer programming services for others; consulting in the fields of telecommunications technology and information technology; rental of computer software and computer hardware; installation, maintenance, and repair of computer software; web page hosting services; operating electronic information networks, namely, database development services; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer security services, namely, computer system administration for others; computer disaster recovery planning; consulting in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems and information technology systems for others; computer technology support services, namely, providing help desk and remote technical support service, namely, monitoring of network systems in the areas of information technology systems, computer hardware, computer software, and electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 18, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 14, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance