Drawing for DANVILLE

USPTO serial 77870324

DANVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard A. MacCord, Jr.

HOWARD A MACCORD JR MACCORD MASON PLLCPO BOX 2974GREENSBORO, NC 27402-2974UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Cigarettes; Smokeless tobacco; Tobacco; Tobacco powder, namely, snusACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 2, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 2, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 14, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Nov 25, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 12, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 13, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 13, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance