USPTO serial 77877155
POINT TO POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POINT TO POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Parrish Lake
Catherine Parrish Lake Stoel Rives LLP201 South Main Street, Suite 1100Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photographic, optical, measuring, signaling, checking instruments, namely, for capturing still images and moving images of traffic scenes and individual vehicles including instruments for measuring the position or speed of such vehicles; apparatus for traffic control in the nature of traffic light apparatus, traffic surveillance apparatus, traffic enforcement apparatus; apparatus for measuring vehicle speed; Automobile surveillance equipment, namely, electric detectors for detecting vehicle speed and electric detectors for detecting and scanning license plates for purposes of stolen vehicle identification; traffic speed detection and violation enforcement systems primarily comprised of housings, network connections, receivers and transmitters, video cameras, still cameras, lasers, sonar, position sensors, timers; mobile and fixed-site speed enforcement systems primarily comprised of housings, network connections, receivers and transmitters, video cameras, still cameras, lasers, sonar, position sensors, timers; vehicle detection and digital imaging systems primarily comprised of proximity sensors, laser sensors, capacitive sensors, magnetic sensors, inductive loop sensors, radar sensors, piezoelectric sensors, weigh-in-motion sensors, video sensors, infrared sensors, sonar sensors, digital cameras; image capture systems including networked license plate reading systems primarily comprised of nodes made up of a video camera, optical character recognition software operating on a central processing unit, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; traffic flow management systems primarily comprised of nodes made up of a video camera and flow management software operating on a processor, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; average speed enforcement systems primarily comprised of nodes made up of video cameras, optical character recognition software operating on a central processing unit, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; time-over-distance speed measuring and enforcement systems primarily comprised of nodes made up of a video camera, optical character recognition software operating on a central processing unit, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; extended road segment speed enforcement systems primarily comprised of nodes made up of a video camera, optical character recognition software operating on a central processing unit, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; automated photo enforcement systems primarily comprised of cameras and remote storage devices housing in a housing; Automobile traffic monitoring equipment, namely, computer software for detecting and recording traffic violations and violations of speed limits and toll booths, for processing and manipulating traffic images, for assessing and utilizing computerized database consisting of traffic information, motor vehicle registration, and for producing and generating reports and citations; vehicle surveillance equipment, namely, nodes made up of cameras and/or proximity sensors, and network hardware and software operatively connecting such nodes; lasers, time over distance, radar, sonar, and video apparatuses for detecting speed, license plate reading devices that detect theft, registration and insurance violations; and cameras for photographing and recording vehicles; automobile surveillance equipment, namely, digital video recording apparatuses; vehicle detectors, namely, magnetic, capacitive, laser, sonar, radar, weight and video based detectors; photographic equipment, namely, radar speed cameras, solar powered speed cameras, signaling equipment, namely, laser, sonar, magnetic, inductive loop, radar and video based speed checking; recording equipment, namely, computer hardware, software for collecting and analyzing the vehicle movement data, video and still image recorders, digital image recorders, digital-based speed detectors, video-based speed detectors, image processing equipment including image capture devices and software for identifying and extracting shapes and patterns from captured images, citation processing equipment and software including processors and databases cooperating to process data to determine the registered owner of a vehicle, and associate a violation together with the fine, and integrated systems thereof including hardware running software for turn-key processing of violations from detection, vehicle identification, evidence gathering and storage, and association with fine and payment information in the form of a citation, all for vehicle monitoring, traffic control, or traffic enforcement; computer hardware and software for traffic monitoring, pattern recognition, traffic information processing and traffic light control, all in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; computerized video based traffic surveillance system comprised of video cameras, local computer controller, and network servers, for detecting and analyzing vehicular traffic flow, and road conditions; computer system comprising electronic hardware and software and a video camera for detecting and identifying motor vehicles moving at speeds in excess of a prescribed average speed limits; computer hardware and computer software for applying artificial intelligence, neural networks and adaptive systems to vehicle or traffic flow classification and identification and for determining an adaptive response to detected inputs; electronic system consisting of application software running on a PC or PC-equivalent electronics, and a video capture hardware card that acquires video images of a traffic scene, interprets the images to detect and track vehicles and measure their speeds; computer software for recognizing characters from images; Software for processing data recorded with the instruments and apparatus as mentioned here-above; Computer software and hardware for determining speed | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |