Drawing for GREENSCREEN

USPTO serial 77882432

GREENSCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENSCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for operating, regulating and monitoring motor vehicles and motor vehicle battery systems; computer hardware and software for regulating, monitoring and reporting on the performance and efficiency of motor vehicles and motor vehicle batter systems; computer hardware and software for displaying real-time and historical data and information regarding motor vehicles and motor vehicle battery systems; electronic equipment and apparatus for operating, regulating and monitoring motor vehicles and motor vehicle battery systems, namely, batteries, battery monitoring systems, sensors, gauges, data processors, data processing consoles, interactive displays, transmitters and receivers, and touch screen user interfaces; electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; vehicle navigation computersACTIVE
012Automobiles and structural parts therefor; electric automobiles and structural parts therefor; battery electric automobiles and structural parts therefor; extended range electric automobiles and structural parts therefor; rechargeable electric automobiles and structural parts therefor; apparatus for locomotion by land, air, or water, namely, cars, trucks, motorcycles, boats, airplanes; electric motors for motor carsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Feb 25, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 24, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 29, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 17, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance