CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FOUNTAINTRAK

USPTO serial 77885580

FOUNTAINTRAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOUNTAINTRAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Yates Dowell III

A. YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL, P.C.103 ORONOCO ST STE 220ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Systems to monitor and control fluid flow for beverage dispensing machines, consisting primarily of computer hardware, computer software for beverage inventory management, fluid sensors, remote data transmitters, and automatic valvesACTIVE—
035Inventory management and control in the field of beverage dispensingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 8, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance