USPTO serial 77889087
O O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with O O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts, t-shirts, sport shirts, polo shirts, rugby shirts, jerseys, tank tops, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, cardigans, turtleneck shirts, jackets, coats, vests, shorts, dresses, pants, slacks, sweat pants, jeans, socks, neckties, headwear, hats, caps, knit caps, visors, wraps, bikinis, swimwear, skiwear, rainwear; athletic suits, namely, ski suits, snowboarding suits, track suits, wet suits; footwear, shoes, sandals, boots, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; sugar; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack bars, processed cereals and muesli; non-essential oils, namely, food flavorings; frozen confectionery; fruit ice bars; freezer pops; freezable liquid for making frozen confections; chocolate and chocolate goods, namely, chocolate candies, chocolate bars, chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate toppings; candy; non-medicated lozenges; lollipops; chewing gum; pralines; edible ices; pudding; honey; yeast; baking powder; starch for food, namely, corn starch for food, starch syrup for food, and sago palm starch for food; salt; mustard; mayonnaise, ketchup; vinegar, sauces, salad dressings; marinades; spices, spice extracts for use as ingredients in food and food flavorings; processed herbs; sauce mixes; pizzas; frozen dough for use as pizza, kits comprised of ingredients for preparing pizza, pizza crust, pizza sauce, fresh pizza dough; pasta; sandwiches; bread; pastries; bread rolls and baguettes; sushi; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic drinks and beverages, namely, mineral and aerated waters, fruit drinks, fruit juices, fruit nectars, vegetable drinks, vegetable juices, isotonic beverages, whey drinks, and soft drinks; water being beverages, namely, bottled water and table water; drinking water with vitamins; mineral water and drinking water enhanced with minerals or antioxidants; syrups and preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit juices, fruit drinks, vegetable juices, vegetable drinks, isotonic beverages, whey drinks, and soft drinks; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; frozen fruit-based beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; powders for use in the preparation of soft drinks and effervescing fruit-based beverages; essences for making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices, vegetable juices, isotonic beverages, whey drinks; energy drinks; beer; non-alcoholic beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOLO GLOBAL HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LOLO GLOBAL HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named O O
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |