USPTO serial 77890829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Studio City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Cartano, Esq.
DAVID J. CARTANO, ESQ. BARTON, KLUGMAN & OETTING LLP350 S GRAND AVE STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1599UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Automated telephone call screening services; Automated telephone voice message services; Captioned telephone services for individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing or speech impaired; Cellular telephone communication; Cellular telephone services; Communication by mobile telephone; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications by telephone; Electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Fixed and mobile telephone services; International telephone services; Interstate telephone services; Intrastate telephone services; Local and long distance telephone services; Long distance telephone communication services; Mobile radio telephone services; Mobile telephone communication; Mobile telephone services; National and international telephone calling plan services; Telecommunication services in the nature of providing telephone features, namely, call waiting, call identification, call forwarding, and message waiting; Telecommunication services in the nature of providing telephone services with various telephone features, namely, a dedicated toll-free number, voicemail, multiple mailbox extensions, telephone message notification, fax capabilities, detailed call reports, call waiting, call identification, call forwarding, and message waiting; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Telecommunication services, namely, providing advanced calling features, namely, providing the ability to record voice memos after a telephone call by leaving a message that will be recorded separately and saved online as a file which can then be emailed, shared or kept private based on the user settings; Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services; Telecommunications reseller services for businesses, namely, providing long distance telecommunication services, voice telecommunication services, local telephone service, and Internet access services; Telephone call completion services for directory assistance customers; Telephone communication services; Telephone communications; Telephone relay services using on-screen video; Telephone services and teletext services; Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; Telephone voice messaging services | ACTIVE | Jul 2, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |