Drawing for STRESSSCORE

USPTO serial 77892385

STRESSSCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRESSSCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRENT K. NOMURA

BRENT K. NOMURA MERRILL NOMURA & MOLINEUX LLP350 ROSE STREETDANVILLE, CA 94526UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing business marketing information, namely, providing scoring and indexing socio-economic information and analysis to determine the social-economic impact on an individual, household or geo-spatial territoryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 19, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 15, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Sep 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 15, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Feb 15, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance