USPTO serial 77894015
DEADMAU5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEADMAU5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Powley
ROBERT L. POWLEY POWLEY & GIBSON, P.C.304 HUDSON ST FL 2NEW YORK, NY 10013-1027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bmx bikes | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | trunks and travelling bags; suitcases; schoolbags; tote bags; backpacks; day packs; handbags; shoulder bags; duffel bags; messenger bags; purses; wallets; leather shoulder belts; credit card holders; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Plush toys, dolls, stuffed toy animals, modeled plastic toy figurines, hand held computer game units other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; hand held electronic game units other than in conjunction with a television or computer; puzzles; board games; balls for games; shin pads and elbow pads for athletic use; golf club head covers; skateboards; musical toys; playing cards; collectable toy figures; automatic, coin operated amusement game machines; Christmas tree decorations; paper or plastic party hats and caps not being clothing | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, coffee essences, coffee extracts; mixtures of coffee and chicory; mixtures of coffee and chicory, chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; tea, tea extracts; cocoa; cocoa based beverages; chocolate; chocolate candies, chocolate bars; sugar, sugar substitutes, namely, maltose, rice, tapioca, sago, couscous; confectionery made of sugar and candy, breakfast cereals; pastry; pizza, pasta and pasta sauce; bread; biscuits; cookies; cakes; ice, ice cream, water ices, frozen confections; mixes for making ice cream and/or water ices and/or frozen confections; honey; preparations consisting wholly or substantially wholly of sugar, for use as substitutes for honey; maple syrup, treacle, molasses; ketchup; sauces and preparations for making sauces, namely, sauce mixes; custard powder; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; dessert mousses; bakery desserts; puddings; yeast, baking powder; salt, pepper, mustard; vinegar; chutney; spices and seasonings; infusions other than for medicinal use, namely, herbal infusions; meat pies; mayonnaise; meat tenderizers for household purposes; royal jelly for human consumption other than for medicinal purposes; natural sweeteners; salad dressings | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated and effervescing waters and carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; isotonic beverages; vegetable drinks, vegetable juices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Catbread Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Catbread Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DEADMAU5
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |