USPTO serial 77896586
PDLA - PERSONAL DAILY LIVING ASSISTANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PDLA - PERSONAL DAILY LIVING ASSISTANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Ackerman
STEPHEN B. ACKERMAN SAILE ACKERMAN LLC28 DAVIS AVEPOUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603-2408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal monitoring systems comprising personal security alarms; interactive medication reminding and management system comprising countdown timers and alarm, for reminding users to take medication; and Wander alert system comprising wearable electronic sensors, transmitters, and receivers used to monitor and detect unauthorized movement of dementia/Alzheimer patients, detect falls, generate alerts, and notify caregivers via telecommunication and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Personal healthcare monitoring systems comprising sensors that monitor the health of the elderly or handicapped in their own homes through their daily living routines and changes of daily living activity patterns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SilverPlus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SilverPlus, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PDLA - PERSONAL DAILY LIVING ASSISTANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |