Drawing for LOLLY

USPTO serial 77899268

LOLLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOLLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent Johnson

BRENT JOHNSON SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, dresses, tops, T-shirts, skirts, leggings, jackets and shortsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 28, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 27, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 27, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 27, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 27, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 24, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 24, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 24, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 24, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 24, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 24, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance