USPTO serial 77900546
EZPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Johnson
Sean D. Johnson INGRASSIA, FISHER, & LORENZ, P.C.7010 E. Cochise Rd.Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for electronic payment services, authentication, identification and transaction services for merchants by means of on-line databases; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payments to merchants; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payments by merchants; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payment to merchants via on-line debit, checking, credit card, and loyalty/reward account payments; computer software for electronic processing and transmission of payments by merchants via on-line debit, checking, credit card, and loyalty/reward account payments; and computer software for providing electronic bill payment transactions featuring a biometric authentication and payment system; excluding the facilitation of the electronic payment of tolls and parking facility charges | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment services, namely, bill payment transaction services for merchants by means of on-line databases; electronic processing and transmission of payments to merchants; electronic processing and transmission of payments by merchants, electronic processing and transmission of payment to merchants via on-line debit, checking, credit card, and loyalty/reward account payments; electronic processing and transmission of payments by merchants via on-line debit, checking, credit card, and loyalty/reward account payments; providing a biometric payment system, namely, providing electronic transmission and processing of financial transactions in the nature of secure commercial transactions and payment options between consumers and merchants; excluding the facilitation of the electronic payment of tolls and parking facility charges | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing identity verification services, providing authentication of personal identification information where individual consumers are identified within databases that link an individual consumer's financial accounts with their biometric data; providing databases featuring identity verification information to merchants wherein the databases facilitate identification of individual customer by linking checking, credit, debit, or loyalty/reward accounts with biometric data; providing identification verification and user authentication in the nature of biometric security scanning via a computer network for the purpose of banking and credit issuance; excluding the facilitation of the electronic payment of tolls and parking facility charges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Validity Sensors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Validity Sensors, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EZPAY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |