Drawing for E 7

USPTO serial 77900921

E 7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PATE, TARA J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E 7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessie K. Reider, California Bar No. 237,113

JESSIE K. REIDER, CALIFORNIA BAR NO. 237,113 BUCHALTER NEMER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-1730UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cell phone accessories, namely, cases, covers, faceplates, backplates, battery chargers, batteries, in-car telephone handset cradles, headsets, handsets, audio speakers, adapters, video game controllers, plug-in connectors, hands free kits, Credit Card readers and barcode scannersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 10, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Apr 13, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Apr 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 11, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 8, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 18, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 22, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 12, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 12, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance