Drawing for LICHDOM

USPTO serial 77906656

LICHDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LICHDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan P. Suedmeyer

NATHAN P. SUEDMEYER LARSON & LARSON, P.A.11199 69TH STLARGO, FL 33773-5504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films about a Lich: a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; pre-recorded DVDs featuring a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; pre-recorded CDs featuring a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; pre-recorded laser discs featuring a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; motion picture film soundtracks; downloadable audio and video recordings featuring a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; downloadable motion pictures featuring a powerful magic user who has discovered immortality; downloadable ring tones, graphics, wallpaper, and music; downloadable electronic games; computer screen saver softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 6, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 27, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 29, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance