USPTO serial 77912014
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Goldschmidt, Jr.
JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR. DILWORTH PAXSON LLP1500 MARKET ST STE 3500EPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SUSPENSION COMPONENTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, LEAF SPRINGS, AIR SPRINGS, COIL SPRINGS, GREASE SEALS, BUSHINGS, EQUALIZERS, SPINDLES, TORSION ARMS, FULL BEAM AXLES, HALF AXLES, STUB AXLES, BRAKE DRUMS, IDLERS, BRAKES, BRAKE MAGNETS, RIM CLAMPS, SPRING PINS, THREADED RODS, U BOLTS, TIE ROD ENDS, DRAG LINKS, CASTINGS, STAMPINGS, WEDGES, COIL SPRINGS, AND REPAIR PLATES, ALL FOR LAND VEHICLES; AXLE COMPONENTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, HUBS, FLANGES, DRUMS, AND COTTER PINS, ALL FOR LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |