Drawing for CHICKEN MARBELLA

USPTO serial 77914121

CHICKEN MARBELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICKEN MARBELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Ambrogi

John L. Ambrogi Partridge IP Law P.C.321 North Clark StreetSuite 720CHICAGO, IL 60654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Sauces and marinadesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 11, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 11, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 6, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 6, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 16, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 16, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 16, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance