CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FINAL WAR

USPTO serial 77916736

FINAL WAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINAL WAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen C. Beuerle

Stephen C. Beuerle Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; computer game software for electronic games of all kinds, namely, handheld computer games; Game software for arcade games; game software for physical and virtual board games; game software for physical and virtual card gamesACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely, brochures and printed marketing materials for use with board games and card gamesACTIVE—
028Apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; games, namely, board games and card games; Game equipment set sold as a unit comprised primarily of game boards, playing cards and also including rules of playACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, conducting alternate reality games via the internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Arranging and conducting live, interactive, treasure hunt gaming adventuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2010GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
May 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance