Drawing for PLANET GREEN

USPTO serial 77920002

PLANET GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MITTLER, KEVIN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANET GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony V. Lupo

Anthony V. Lupo ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded video disks, audio-visual recordings, videotapes, compact disks, DVDs and CD-ROMs in the field of general human interestACTIVE
038Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet, cable networks, wireless networks, satellite, or interactive multimedia networks; audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; transmission of information in the audio-visual field; television broadcasting services; cable television broadcasting; satellite television broadcasting; mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; podcasting services; webcasting services; video-on-demand transmission services; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages in the field of general interestACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, multimedia programs in the field of general interest, distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; providing entertainment information regarding ongoing television programs via a global computer network; production of television programs; production of multimedia programsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 11, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 26, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 28, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 1, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 13, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 13, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 4, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 4, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 5, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 30, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jan 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance