Drawing for RESORTS WORLD

USPTO serial 77923274

RESORTS WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESORTS WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle R. Scheinberg

DANIELLE R. SCHEINBERG BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Playing cards; Cases for playing cards; Gaming tables and parts therefor, namely, gaming table tops; Casino gaming equipment, namely, dice, dice counters, dice sticks, dominoes, marbles for games, poker chips, poker chip cases, poker chip trays, poker chip dealing shoes, poker carousels, poker card covers in the nature of poker card guards, poker cloths in the nature of mats for poker tables, lottery cards, lottery tickets and lottery wheels; Games involving gaming, namely, traditional table-based games for playing 3 card poker, card games for playing pontoon, card games for playing three picture, roulette wheels, card games for playing baccarat, cards games for playing mini baccarat, card games for playing blackjack, cards games for playing Caribbean stud poker, card games for playing casino war, petanque balls for playing French boule, dice for playing tai sai, playing cards for playing pai gow, mini dice and money wheels in the nature of game wheels; electronic table-based games, namely, electronic game equipment with a watch function for playing touch bet rouletteACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 11, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 15, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 12, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 16, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 15, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 26, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 10, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 8, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 18, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 4, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance