USPTO serial 77931776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
21200 Raisio, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl Hodgson
Cheryl L. Hodgson HODGSON LEGAL100 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 950SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products, namely, acidophilus milk, beverages consisting principally of milk, beverages having a milk-base, beverages made from yoghurt, cheese, cheese food, cheese substitutes, cheese spreads, condensed milk, cream powder, cream fraiche, creamers for beverages, curd, dairy-based beverages, milk powder, non-dairy-based beverages, non-dairy-based spreads, non-dairy-based dips, non-dairy-based powders for making non-dairy-based food beverages and shakes, eggnog, evaporated milk, goat milk, margarine, margarine substitutes, milk, milk-based beverages containing fruit juice, milk beverages containing fruits, milk-based energy drinks, milk-based beverages containing milk concentrates, vegetable oil and added nutrients, milk-based beverages containing coffee, non-dairy creamer, nut-based milk, oat milk, rice milk, hazelnut milk, almond milk, soy milk, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, vegetable-based food beverages, vegetable-based spreads, yoghurt, yoghurt drinks, yoghurt-based beverages; edible oils and fats; processed edible seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely cereal-based snack foods, cereal-based energy bars, ready to eat cereals, oat, rice, soy and other cereals, processed cereals, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods, malt and wheat flour based mixes for the manufacture of bread, pastry and confectionery, mixes for bakery goods, bagels, baguettes, brioches, cones for ice cream, corn flakes, crackers, muesli, panini, sandwiches and toast, granola, cereal bars, rice flakes, cakes, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, bread, pastry, yeast and baking powder, pizza dough, pastry, biscuits, cookies and crackers, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, oat and wheat bran, gluten free cookies, dairy free cookies, cereal based cookies, flour, self-rising flour, durum wheat semolina, powdered ready mix for pizza, powdered ready mix for pasta, powdered ready mix for cakes, powdered ready mix for bread, powdered ready mix for frying, chick-peas flour, chestnut flour, and maize flour, cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient in making other foods, oatmeal and oatflakes, sweet red bean paste, food bars and breakfast cereals containing omega-3 fatty acids and EPA-DHA fatty acids; pasta and noodles, processed quinoa flakes, quinoa puffs, processed quinoa flour, processed fonio flakes, processed fonio puffs, processed fonio flour, doughnuts, bagels, baguettes, biscuits, bread crumbs, brownies, popcorn, cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement, granola bars, corn starch based drink in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge, couscous semolina, flour-based gnocchi, grain-based beverages, polenta, sesame sticks, tabbouleh, tacos, tortillas, corn mush, buckwheat mush, frozen, prepared, or packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, pasta, cereal biscuits, cereal crisps; buns; confectionery, namely, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products, confectionery chips for baking, peanut butter confectionery chips, cookies, crackers, biscuits, biscuits with marshmallow, candies, chocolate candies, waffles, wafers, cakes, fruit ices, sweets, ice-cream; bread, pastry and confectionery, ices non-dairy ice cream; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; unprocessed edible seeds, natural plants and flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters, non-alcoholic beverages made of fruit, vegetable or berries; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit, vegetables or berries | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |