Drawing for WHIRLING DERVISH

USPTO serial 77934016

WHIRLING DERVISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHIRLING DERVISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Brucker

WILLIAM J. BRUCKER STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Fruit-based organic food bars, also containing fruits, dried fruits, fruit juice, grain, vitamins, minerals, vegetables, nuts, processed edible seeds and seed oils, vegetable oils, soy products and dairy productsACTIVE
030Grain-based food bars, cookies and crackers containing soy, dried fruits, chocolate, nuts, protein, dairy products, seeds, seed oils, vitamins, minerals, vegetables, vegetable oils, flour, wheat flour and white sugar, brown sugar, granulated sugar and crystal sugarACTIVE
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks; herbal juices and non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of energy beverages; sports drinks; flavored drinking water with vitamins; syrups or powders used in the preparation of isotonic sports drinks and sports beverages or flavored non-alcoholic beverages, fruit drinks and juicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jun 19, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 6, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jan 7, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 27, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 2, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jan 20, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 20, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 6, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Mar 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance