Drawing for DATA FACTORY

USPTO serial 77937112

DATA FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATA FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for use in collecting and integrating data from an externally managed source into a data model; computer programs for use in storing and managing data; computer programs for use in applying methodology to create data specifications and reports; libraries of pre-defined data models, namely, computer programs featuring configuration settings and models for use in the statistical analysis of data; data warehouse and analytic appliances, namely, computer chassis, blade servers, computers, memory expansion modules, computer servers, field programmable gate arrays, computer switches, computer disk drive arrays, computer cables, and computer hardware and computer programs all being for use in storing, searching, modeling and analyzing content, documents, data and mediaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 18, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jul 17, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 10, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 9, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 28, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 28, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance