Drawing for DRAW-TITE

USPTO serial 77938369

DRAW-TITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DRAW-TITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tarpaulins specially designed for flatbed trailers of tractor-trailer semi trucks comprising four walls, a roof, and aluminum extension and connection parts for forming a weatherproof, enclosed cargo bay capable of being retracted to allow direct access to the flatbedABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 2, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 2, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 2, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Apr 24, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 23, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 13, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 19, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance