USPTO serial 77939852
PUNISHMINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PUNISHMINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ingredients used in the manufacture of light beverages, namely, carrageenan, gellan gum and xanthan gum; Polyvinyl alcohol soluble films for use in the manufacture of delivery agents for pharmaceuticals, breath freshener, vitamins, and candy | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Breath freshening confectionary, namely, dissolvable breath strips, breath mints, candy and gum; Breath mints for use as a breath freshener; Dentifrices in the form of chewing gum | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Breath-freshening chewing gum for medicinal purposes; Chewing gum for medical purposes; Medicated candies; Medicated candy; Medicated chewing gum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |